The
Practical Practitioner

Bill Daniels
 


In Defense of the Honorable Manuel L. Real

The topic of judicial habit, predilection and demeanor is one of eternal fascination for any able trial lawyer. If you know your stuff, then I think you’ll agree, getting to know everything you can about the judge in your case is one of the most important prep items you can perform.

The subject is at the top of my mind because of a case I just settled where the personality of the jurist played a significant role. It was an excessive use of force case in federal court against a local police department. It wasn’t a huge matter to most of the world, but to my client, as you might imagine, it meant everything.

When I first filed the case, I was assigned to the Honorable Edward Rafeedi, a jurist who had the reputation of being a something of an uber-rocket-docketeer. That didn’t really bother me, as I thought a little speed might actually help my particular case. Then, one day I read in the Daily Journal that Judge Rafeedie had been elevated to a higher court. Technically, he died. I held my breath and waited to learn where my little case would land.

A few days later, I was getting ready to start a deposition when my opposing counsel walked in the door. “Do you know anything about Manuel Real?” he asked me.

“Oh, did we draw him?” I asked innocently. Of course, I knew this jurist by reputation, so I had some reason for concern.

Just in case you aren’t acquainted, Judge Real is what we call a controversial figure. A former U.S. Attorney, he was appointed a a U.S. District Court judge in 1966 and served as Chief Judge of the Central District of California from 1982 to 1993. Born in 1924, he took senior status some time back. Among his notable decisions was ordering forced busing in the Pasadena school system in 1970. In short, this is a fellow who has accomplished much in life.

On the other hand, there are those who hold Judge Real in low regard. For example, 38 raters on TheRobingRoom.com rate Judge Real at an average 2.8 out of 10, with plenty of “1's” in the ratings. The comments run from supportive to scathing.

A 1999 by Paul Elias on Law.com sort of sums up the situation in an even-handed manner:
 
U.S. District Judge Manuel Real is a peach of a guy.

Seriously.

He's 75 years old, completely gray, and as regal and grandfatherly as they come. He's in pretty good shape, too. Trim, good looking, and he appears athletic.

"Gardening," he says modestly.

The 33-year veteran of the Los Angeles federal bench also has that President Clinton handshake, the two-handed one made famous in Primary Colors, the one that makes the recipient feel special. It's nice.

Hell, they've even named an elementary school after him. Dedicated it last year with the judge in attendance. It's out there in the dusty, Inland Empire town of Perris. Real's exceedingly proud of that school.

It's also endearing how he describes himself as a "San Pedro boy" who still lives in the neighborhood, just a mile from the home he grew up in with his Spanish immigrant parents.

So why does everybody hate Manny Real?

"Something happens to Real when he puts on that robe," says Victor Sherman, a Santa Monica criminal defense attorney. "I don't know what it is, but he's a tyrant. A bully. He thinks he's lord king of the courtroom."

* * *

While he's got plenty of detractors, Real's supporters are hardly in short supply. "He's old school," chuckles Beverly Hills attorney Bruce Hochman, a friend for 46 years. "He emulates the training he received. That's how the judges were back then. Everything by the numbers. You think Judge Real's a tyrant? You should have seen Judge [Charles] Carr."

* * *

Real says he is aware of his dual personality. But he also offers some reasons for it. "For a judge there are two lives," he says. "We are about very serious business. We are dealing with people's lives and money. Life on the bench is totally different for me than off the bench."

* * *

Among those in the ranks of Real's supporters are former clerks, who express fierce loyalty for their old boss. "I can tell you he was an unbelievably great guy to work for," says Loyola Law School professor Daniel Selmi, who clerked for the judge in 1975-76. "I think he's a wonderful man. He's totally honest and full of character."

On the internet I learned that in 2006, the House of Representatives held a hearing on whether or not Judge Real should be impeached for “high crimes and misdemeanors” (he wasn’t) and that in 2007 the Ninth Circuit was considering handing him a reprimand for misconduct (they did).

Still, if there’s anything I’ve learned over the years, it is to keep an open mind. So, I called a good friend of mine who is prominent in the federal bar and told her I’d been assigned to Judge Real and what did she think of that?

“Oh, dear,” she replied. I love elegant understatement.

The punch line is, I am convinced my case finally settled in part because neither side was completely sure just what Judge Real would be like in trial. The settlement was pretty much what you’d expect when it falls in the proper range, neither side completely happy, neither side completely sad.

I will report that both sides prepared for trial with extra care and diligence because of our jurist’s reputation and, who knows, maybe that meant that we all understood our strengths and weaknesses a little more clearly at the end. Oh, and I need to tip my hat to Magistrate Judge Margaret Nagle, who acted as the settlement judge and brought two sides that were miles apart into the same ball park at the eleventh hour. Heck of a job, I have to say.

So, what’s the lesson here? I think it’s obvious, don’t you?

The next time you draw a judge who makes you wince, or find a fact you wish you hadn’t, or represent a client who your wish you weren’t, take heart.

For a skilled practitioner, there is always hope even in the face of grave adversity.

Also, if you are going to walk on dangerous ground, make sure you know when to wear your plodding hikers and when to strap on those speedy running shoes.

LEARNING CENTER
for more information:

Bill Daniels regularly publishes a variety of articles and videos to keep you abreast of legal developments and case law that affect our society.

ARTICLES:

The Cost of Bias in the Legal Profession
Bias in the judicial system costs us all.
  Everything Matters: Secrets of Building a Better Plaintiff Practice
Seven Rules for Picking Cases
  Civil Lawsuits Have a High Purpose
Civil lawsuits are a way to take on public menaces and let the community fix what’s broken.

VIDEOS:

Documents/Request for Production
This video covers “Request for Production”. Preparing your documents for any case is important. This video covers 7 important tips to gathering documents in a lawsuit.

Bill Daniels | Law Offices has a reputation for winning milestone cases. Our successful track record proves it, with Bill Daniels involved with multiple significant verdicts and settlements in the tens and even hundreds of millions of dollars. When facing a tough opponent, you need an equally aggressive advocate on your side willing to do battle for you!

Contact us today for a free consultation on the merits of your case. When you are facing a tough opponent, put the passion and expertise of Bill Daniels | Law Offices on your side.
 

 

back to top

 

Disclaimer
The contents of this website are for informational purposes only. It is not intended to serve as legal advice. It is not an invitation to establish an attorney-client relationship, and you should not rely upon any information presented here without first seeking legal advice from an attorney licensed to practice law in your jurisdiction.

Sending email to Bill Daniels | Law Offices, APC or accessing this website does not form an attorney-client relationship.

 

Home     Employment Law   Class Action     Serious Personal Injury    Learning Center    About Our Firm     Contact